Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a score of 90.8 against 77. The Galaxy Note 20 is a way older, a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo feature quite similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have equal internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.