Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy Note 20's design is a lot older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a quite better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo and Galaxy Note 20 both have really similar batteries duration, although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has 4310mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.