Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a 90.8 score against 87.1. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way older than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. They have a display with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same amount of pixels in each screen inch. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.