Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G Power, even when both were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images in poorly lited environments and a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher video quality.
Moto G Power features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.