Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G30's global score of 78.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G30, although they were released only a few months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a brighter screen than Moto G30, because it has a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Moto G30 has a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G30 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto G30 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G30 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture and a camera with way more mega pixels. Motorola Moto G30 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.