Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Moto G60, getting a 90.8 score against 79.5. The Galaxy Note 20 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G60, although both were released with only a few months difference. Galaxy Note 20 has a little better performance than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G60, although it has a quite lower display pixels density, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display. The Moto G60 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. Motorola Moto G60 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60 also counts with better video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.