Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G71 5G's 82.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a a bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G71 5G, but they have the same thickness. Moto G71 5G features a screen that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy Note 20, because although the Moto G71 5G has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G71 5G's camera is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 one, and although the Moto G71 5G has a lot better resolution camera in the back and better 60 fps video frame rates, they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same aperture.
Moto G71 5G and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 both feature very similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have the same internal storage. Moto G71 5G has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.