Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Moto G8 Power, having a score of 90.8 against 76. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Moto G8 Power, even though both were released with only 4 months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Moto G8 Power has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G8 Power features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% bigger battery size. Galaxy Note 20 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in low-light situations and a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a much higher video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G8 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G8 Power, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.