Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G9 Plus, even though both of them were released with only 1 months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G9 Plus has better battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The Moto G9 Plus shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G9 Plus also has better video frame rate, a camera with lot more megapixels and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.