Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, getting a global score of 90.8 against 78.6. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Moto G9 Power were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is lighter and thinner. The Galaxy Note 20 features a better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Moto G9 Power shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the Moto G9 Power also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.