Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a 90.8 score against 77.4. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is a lot heavier and extremely thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 58% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a bigger aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and a way better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs more than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.