Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it is noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 captures better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much higher video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.