Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola razr (2022), with a 90.8 score against 81.1. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is older and just a little bit thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's design is still just a bit lighter. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Note 20. Both have the same count of pixels per display inch, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and a same size display.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 20. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy Note 20 one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4300mAh battery size. The Motorola razr (2022) captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.