Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a 90.8 score against 79.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has better 30 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.