Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Nokia 9.3 PureView's general score of 84.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite higher display density. Nokia 9.3 PureView's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 20's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has faster video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.