Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Galaxy A22, having a 90.8 score against 76.1. Galaxy Note 20's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A22, but it is just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 has a better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a better screen density, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy Note 20 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A22 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.