Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than Samsung Galaxy A30, having a overall score of 90.8 against 79.6. The Galaxy Note 20 design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30's, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low light situations and a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 has a little better battery life than Galaxy A30, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.