Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the Galaxy A34, having a 90.8 score against 82.9. Galaxy A34 features a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although the Galaxy A34 has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A34 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.