Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A52's 90.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A52, but it's just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a display that's very similar to Galaxy Note 20's screen, because although the Galaxy A52 has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.