Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit better than Galaxy F23, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 84.6. The Galaxy Note 20 construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy F23, but it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy F23 features a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 one, because although the Galaxy F23 has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408px resolution and a just a little better screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Galaxy F23 count with really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.