Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a 90.8 score against 88.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62, even though they were released with only a few months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 20. Both have the same quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a same size screen and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has better video frame rate, a way more mega pixels back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.