Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 20, having a 95.4 score against 90.8. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than Galaxy Note 20, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a greater display density, a little larger display and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy Note 20, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 24 fps video frame rate, the same 7680x4320 video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is more expensive than Galaxy Note 20, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.