Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer and thinner device than Galaxy S7 Active, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.