Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting a global score of 90.8 against 78.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and the Galaxy XCover 5 were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bigger display and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.