Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 90.8 against 80.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is incredibly lighter and way thinner. Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor and a much better video resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 20 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.