Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's overall score of 88.5. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy Note 20's construction is just a bit heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit greater screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy Note 20's processor, they have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 12 MP back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.