Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 90.8 against 78.3. Despite being the best we are comparing, we must tell that it's also an older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. Galaxy Note 20 and vivo X70 Pro feature very similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per inch in the display.
The vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations and higher video frame rates.
The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.