Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black |
| Plastic | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a 90.8 score against 88.9. Galaxy Note 20's design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 2088 x 2250px. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.