Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a score of 82.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, providing you some additional features. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a notably thinner and lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note 3.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lower number of cores and 13 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.