Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, having an 81.9 score against 81.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little heavier than Galaxy Note 3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the newer 14 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a quite bigger display and a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back camera with lot more MP, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.