Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G71 5G has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.2. The Moto G71 5G is a just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy Note 3, but both have the same thickness. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Moto G71 5G has 11 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, giving you a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G71 5G, although it has a little bit lower display density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The Motorola Moto G71 5G's CPU is very similar to Galaxy Note 3's CPU, because although the Motorola Moto G71 5G has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower) and a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G71 5G captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Moto G71 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.