Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 78.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction is a little bit lighter than vivo X70 Pro, although it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 9 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller display and a little bit worse display density.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a way bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a camera with way more MP and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos.
Vivo X70 Pro features much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.