Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's general score of 81.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a incredibly newer and a little thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, although it is somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, counting with some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of display, a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and more 2300 megahertz processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a back camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro costs a little more money than the Galaxy Note 3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.