Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2014-01-30 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.84 x 3.05 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 759.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 5 Hexa chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz + Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T624 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 has a general score of 91.8, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo's overall score of 70.5. Even though Galaxy S21 is a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, it's a bit thinner and extremely newer. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S21 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S21 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a little larger screen, a way better display density and a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy S21 features a better processing power than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a camera with a lot higher 12 MP resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S21 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S21 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy Note 3 Neo, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.