Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
T-MobileSM-N900T
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 420 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 4.4.2. Although LG V40 ThinQ is a little heavier than Galaxy Note 3, it's a little thinner and also way newer.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a bit smaller display and a lot less pixels per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way larger diafragm aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.