Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. The Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older device than vivo X70 Pro, but it's a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores. The Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.