Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, having an 88.1 score against 81.7. IPhone X's construction weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, but it is just a bit thinner. Galaxy Note Edge features a slightly better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
IPhone X has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Apple iPhone X has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a higher number of cores.
IPhone X captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution, a tinier camera sensor and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge features just a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.