Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 335.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a overall score of 81.7 against 74.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note Edge has the older 5.0 version while Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy Note Edge is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but Samsung was able to build it a bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with a faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note Edge also has a GPU and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note Edge features just a bit better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a camera that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note Edge's camera, and although the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with way more megapixels, they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy Note Edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note Edge, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.