Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 335.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Edge, with an 83.8 score against 81.7. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a way newer device, and it's also a little lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy Note Edge. The Galaxy Note Edge has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A50 has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.