Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a 92.1 score against 80.4. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition's body is newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is way heavier and thicker. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little worse 1280 x 2800 resolution and a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 75 percent larger battery size. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a lot better resolution camera in the back, better 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a larger camera aperture for better low-light images.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Note Fan Edition. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.