Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 general score. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than LG Q70, it's design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better performance than LG Q70. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The LG Q70 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations and a smaller camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
The LG Q70 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q70, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.