Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 81.2 score against 80.4. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V40 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V40 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.