Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The Motorola edge body is notably newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen density.
Motorola edge has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola edge counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola edge also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola edge has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola edge has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola edge not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.