Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a general score of 84.7 against 80.4. The Motorola Edge (2022) construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it is a bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% greater battery capacity. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and faster video frame rates.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.