Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.