Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a overall score of 82.6 against 80.4. Even though Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a processing unit that is very similar to the Galaxy Note Fan Edition one, they have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way more mega pixels camera and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Moto G 5G Plus features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.