Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 76. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is notably older than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, it's body is thinner and lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto G8 Power features slightly more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power. Both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G8 Power captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G8 Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some money and get the Moto G8 Power, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.