Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older phone than Moto G9 Power, but it is somewhat thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G9 Power. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Moto G9 Power has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Power counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Moto G9 Power captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.