Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a 90.7 score against 80.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy A52 and Galaxy Note Fan Edition count with quite similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A52 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A52 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.