Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a 95.4 score against 80.4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much better video resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.